You are encouraged to check out newly added content from time to time by navigating to the "What's New" page
Here are Some Strategies for Checking for Understanding & Formative Assessment
Click/Tap to read more and link
** Link to Checking for Understanding Strategies**
Imagine a classroom where every student is fully engaged, their understanding continuously monitored and supported. This is the power of Checking for Understanding – a practice that transforms the learning experience for both teachers and students.
By frequently Checking for Understanding, teachers can pinpoint areas that need reinforcement and adapt their instruction in real-time. It's like having a finely-tuned radar system, allowing them to course-correct and ensure no learner is left behind.
But Checking for Understanding isn't just about identifying gaps; it's about empowering students to take charge of their learning journey. When students are actively involved in assessing their comprehension, they become invested partners in their educational success.
Checking for Understanding is the key to unlocking differentiation. It enables teachers to tailor their approach to the diverse needs of their learners, ensuring that every student receives the support they need to thrive.
Moreover, Checking for Understanding promotes responsive teaching and learning. By providing immediate feedback and allowing for adjustments on the fly, it creates a dynamic, collaborative learning environment where both teachers and students can adapt and grow together.
Perhaps most importantly, Checking for Understanding fosters learner agency. When students are encouraged to question, explore, and discover, they become active participants in their learning, developing the skills and confidence to navigate their educational paths.
Check out these four webinars from Toddle. They explore:
Making assessments visible in the early years
Developing self-assessors in single subjects
Designing student-centered assessment
Designing success criteria: The key to powerful assessments
Dos and don’ts for comment-writing
Structuring a comment
Sample Comments
This informative and thought-provoking blog post by AJ Juliani addresses the issue of grade inflation and the over-reliance on assessing final products in education, which fails to capture the actual learning process.
It argues that with the rise of AI, assessing only the final product becomes even less reliable, as it's difficult to determine the extent of student learning.
Instead, the article advocates for shifting the focus to assessing the learning process itself, providing seven practical strategies including GRIT rubrics, screencasting, video annotations, process rubrics, failing reports, benchmark presentations and portfolios to achieve this, ultimately leading to more meaningful feedback and genuine learning.
Click/tap to read more
Key Points
The current education system's emphasis on final product grades doesn't accurately reflect whether real learning is occurring.
Assessing the learning process is crucial, especially with the increasing accessibility of AI tools that can generate final products.
The GRIT rubric measures students' Guts, Resiliency, Integrity, and Tenacity during the project, focusing on the process rather than the final outcome.
Screencasting allows educators to see and hear students' thought processes as they solve problems, providing a more accurate assessment of their understanding.
Video annotations enable students to reflect on their learning by adding voiceovers and drawings to their work, emphasizing the learning journey.
"Failing Reports" encourage students to share their struggles and mistakes, fostering a classroom culture that supports risk-taking and learning from errors.
Portfolios, whether learning or showcase, provide a comprehensive view of a student's growth and learning journey over time.
Related Questions
How can educators balance assessing the learning process with the need for standardized assessments?
What are the potential challenges and solutions in implementing process-based assessment strategies in diverse classroom settings?
How can AI be used to support and enhance process-based assessment, rather than just being a tool for generating final products?
Within the PYP framework, Progress Reports serve to "inform the learning community and reflect on the question 'how well are we doing?' Describing students' progress and achievements, identifying areas for growth, they contribute to the program's effectiveness" (79, Learning and Teaching, From Principles into Practice).
This guide, from Toddle ,delves into the enigmatic nature of the Report Card or Progress Report, addressing key questions: What is the optimal reporting approach? Is there a singular right method? How can our teaching and learning approach be effectively communicated? And, crucially, how can we convey student growth in a parent-friendly manner?
This interesting blog post by AJ Juliani addresses the issue of grade inflation and the over-reliance on assessing final products in education, which fails to capture the actual learning process.
It argues that with the rise of AI, assessing only the final product becomes even less reliable, as it's difficult to determine the extent of student learning.
Instead, the article advocates for shifting the focus to assessing the learning process itself, providing seven practical strategies including GRIT rubrics, screencasting, video annotations, process rubrics, failing reports, benchmark presentations and portfolios to achieve this, ultimately leading to more meaningful feedback and genuine learning.
Click/tap to read more